The familiar is not universal
An English-speaking learner may expect a plural suffix, subject-first sentence and unmarked source of information. Other languages organize these domains differently. WALS describes Ngiti plural tone and Hixkaryana object–verb–subject order under specific criteria. Such patterns are ordinary grammar for their speakers, not irregularities that need translation into an English template.
Rarity relative to a sample
Calling a feature rare requires a defined comparison set and reliable analyses of its members. A survey might count one clause order as uncommon, yet the language exhibiting it may have other frequent orders in questions or focused clauses. A small ancient corpus may simply lack enough examples to decide. Describe the attested construction before giving it a typological label.
Evidence first
A modern comparison can alert us to the possibility of tone marking number or a quotative marking reported information. It does not prove an ancient text used the same strategy. Search the ancient paradigm, inscriptions and editorial notes for the contrast. Where none survives, mark the category unknown rather than filling it by analogy.
Modern-language examples on this page clarify a linguistic pattern. They do not establish unattested sounds or forms for an ancient language. Follow the cited sources below and keep editorial readings separate from the surviving trace.