Language
Help

Morphology

Latin model paradigms

Read complete noun and verb grids while keeping model forms separate from cited tokens.

Attic decree fragment, The Met 26.60.8

A paradigm as a model

Dickinson College Commentaries presents stella “star” as a first-declension model. The grid below follows its chart, preserving long vowels with macrons. It is a grammar paradigm, not a claim that all ten forms occur in a single inscription or manuscript. Before using one form to interpret a text, find the actual token, date, orthography and syntax. A model helps identify possibilities; the witness supplies the occurrence.

Rows name case, columns name number. The nominative can mark a subject in many clauses, the accusative a direct object in many clauses, the genitive a dependent or possessive relationship, and the dative often a recipient or beneficiary. The ablative has several functions. These descriptions are starting points, not English translations that fit every sentence.

What the noun grid reveals

The singular genitive and dative have the same model form stellae. The plural nominative also has stellae. Their identity is syncretism, so a bare stellae token cannot be assigned a case and number from form alone. The plural dative and ablative both have stellīs. The singular nominative stella and ablative stellā differ in vowel length in the model; a manuscript without macrons may not show that distinction graphically.

Dickinson’s grammar records historical and special case forms in its separate §43, including old genitive singular -āī and alternative dative/ablative plural endings in particular nouns. The classroom grid is a model for a declension class; it is not an exhaustive record of every period, noun and register.

A present verb grid

The DCC first-conjugation chart gives present active indicative and subjunctive forms of amō. Its six person-number rows demonstrate agreement; the two mood columns demonstrate that the same lexeme can have a distinct form across mood. The source intentionally leaves the subjunctive untranslated because its interpretation varies by construction. The familiar English translation “I love” does not encode all the grammatical values of amō by itself.

Compare amō with amās and amāmus. Do not infer a perfectly invariant stem by cutting off the last one or two letters in every cell: the DCC chart notes stem-vowel behavior before -ō and in the subjunctive. A grammar’s conjugation class accounts for these alternations.

Practice

Using the stella grid, list every case-number reading compatible with stellae before looking at a sentence. Then find a Latin passage containing the form and use its construction to eliminate candidates. Keep the passage’s spelling distinct from the macronized grammar model. For the verb grid, compare one indicative and subjunctive pair and explain why a translation alone cannot identify the mood.

stella · first-declension model
CaseSingularPlural
Nominativestellastellae
Genitivestellaestellārum
Dativestellaestellīs
Accusativestellamstellās
Ablativestellāstellīs
Adapted from Meagan Ayer, Dickinson College Commentaries, CC BY-SA; model forms in an edited grammar, not tokens from one witness. Meagan Ayer, Latin first-declension chart, Dickinson College Commentaries (CC BY-SA) ↗
amō · present active forms
Person and numberIndicativeSubjunctive
First singularamōamem
Second singularamāsamēs
Third singularamatamet
First pluralamāmusamēmus
Second pluralamātisamētis
Third pluralamantament
Adapted from Meagan Ayer, Dickinson College Commentaries, CC BY-SA; the subjunctive has no one fixed English translation. Meagan Ayer, Latin first-conjugation present active chart, Dickinson College Commentaries (CC BY-SA) ↗
Evidence and comparison

Modern-language examples on this page clarify a linguistic pattern. They do not establish unattested sounds or forms for an ancient language. Follow the cited sources below and keep editorial readings separate from the surviving trace.